4 ms·

„Is“ is a model that is indistinguishable from truth.

• mistermann 2y ago
  How could you possibly obtain accurate information about the distinguishing abilities of all Humans?
  • adrianN 2y ago
    They are irrelevant for the question of this thread. No human can observe unobservable things by definition.
    • mistermann 2y ago
      > They are irrelevant for the question of this thread. Then why did you mention it? And, you made a claim in response to my question...so what gives? This technique seems a bit unfair. Regardless: is relevance objective? How is it measured? Also: note that "are" is a conjugation of "is". This creates a bit of an epistemic problem does it not (considering your comment above)? > No human can observe unobservable things by definition. Religion is a classic counterpoint to this. Nonexistence is another. Relevance is another. Omniscience another. There are tons of examples, with new ones coming online every day! Plus: does defining reality to be a certain way necessarily mean it takes on that form, or might it only cause it to appear to have taken on that form?