4 ms·
Using such new technology seems anything but “boring” to me. React was only 5-months old, and Go was only 4-years old, when healthcare.gov was launched. First
by tiffanyh 2y ago
Using such new technology seems anything but “boring” to me.
React was only 5-months old, and Go was only 4-years old, when healthcare.gov was launched.
First released:
- Go (Nov 2009)
- React (May 2013)
- Healthcare.gov (Oct 2013)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/React_(JavaScript_library) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/React_(JavaScript_library)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HealthCare.gov https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HealthCare.gov
EDIT:
I missed this in the article:
> There are many valid criticisms of react; this piece is an example, and I was aware of the issues already in 2018 when I was building the site.
- llimllib 2y agoThis work was begun in June of 2018. Go in the healthcare.gov context that Paul Smith used it was indeed an innovation token; they were in a dire situation at that point.