4 ms·
A rational answer would be 100% staff resign suddenly, not only for them but for all enterprises mandating RTO. Aside new website listing "anti-progress enslavi
by kkfx 2y ago
A rational answer would be 100% staff resign suddenly, not only for them but for all enterprises mandating RTO. Aside new website listing "anti-progress enslaving firms" with a "hall of shame": guys do not even send a CV to them.
If this happen for real RTO disappear, if not... You know that the sole purpose of the office is keeping people in dense cities to keep financial capitalism alive on the shoulders of all. Choose.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 2y agoI honestly wish WFH was a movement that had a face ( that could be trusted ) to pull something like that off. I would love to see it, but it would require actual coordination.
- kkfx 2y agoWell, modern IT seems to be the best tool to coordinate... And most potential WFH people actually are in or anyway use, so should at least know enough, such powerful tool... My fear is that people today is unable to unite in general, for no matter what.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 2y agoYou do have a point. Tools are there. What this suggests is kinda depressing though: 'People are unable to think in terms of their own self-interest when it means acting as a group'. edit: I am expressly not volunteering, because I am not a leader and have a charisma of a wet noodle. I do, however, perceive a strong need for someone, who could rally WFH people. edit2: There are, naturally, risks including that of corporations starting to equate WFH with union organization ( and I almost wonder if it is part of the longer term strategy ). but that one seems more far fetched.