3 ms·
It seems obvious to me that there is no such thing as AI without publicly training on the open web, and that any kind of licensing is an impossible feat. Progr
by sircastor 2y ago
It seems obvious to me that there is no such thing as AI without publicly training on the open web, and that any kind of licensing is an impossible feat.
Programs from my youth (Daria, Captain N) had licensed music for their broadcast, and that’s all because what else was ever going to be done? 20 years later, streaming with the music intact is an impossibility because the kind of money necessary to license all of it was too much. And you have to make deals with dozens of companies.
Multiply that by several orders of magnitude and you start to see the scope of the problem.
- barbariangrunge 2y agoI don’t care if it’s expensive or difficult. If somebody wants copyrighted content to train an ai, buy the rights to it before creating these derivative works based on it
- pdonis 2y ago> It seems obvious to me that there is no such thing as AI without publicly training on the open web, and that any kind of licensing is an impossible feat. Yes, I think this is correct. Which means the business model of AI, or at least AI as companies like Microsoft are currently implementing it, is fundamentally at odds with anyone that posts any content on the Internet having copyright and the rights associated with it.