> Content published openly online inherently invites broad consumption, reproduction, and creative reuse by the public. You're using "invites" as a weaselword

> Content published openly online inherently invites broad consumption, reproduction, and creative reuse by the public. You're using "invites" as a weaselword here. Then you go into the law, as if the law is discussing "invitations." Counterpoint: content published online is usually extremely hostile to reproduction, and the people who produce it are deathly afraid of other people copying their work and outranking them with it. > —-Lastly, if anyone really thinks the Robert’s court is going to knee-cap AI, you’re soft in the head. If you think the Roberts court is going to be hostile to copyright, you're insane.