4 ms·
It's true. And for other kinds of more common uses like watching for flaws. Imagine a system like this watching for small flaws in something with a repeated tex
by xhkkffbf 2y ago
It's true. And for other kinds of more common uses like watching for flaws. Imagine a system like this watching for small flaws in something with a repeated texture. The algorithm will assume the flaw is a mistake make by the camera because of poor resolution and cover up the flaw.
- tliltocatl 2y ago"A camera that produces a nice picture" and "a camera that tries reproduce reality as faithfully as possible" are going to become two different products. That's also a problem because the second one is not going to benefit from the economy of scales of the first one…