3 ms·
The problem is that even when incorrect, typically someone intended the correct information to on a website. Where LLMs are just an inference of related words.
by SV_BubbleTime 2y ago
The problem is that even when incorrect, typically someone intended the correct information to on a website.
Where LLMs are just an inference of related words.
So by your scenario, the LLM also picked up the incorrect answer on a website and included it into its inference.
He isn’t downvoted for being lazy, he’s downvoted for using a language model as a fact model. Even if sometimes it does work.
- zamadatix 2y agoThe problem has nothing to do with how you're finding your sources and everything to do with the lack of bothering to verify and understand them properly. What does it matter if you got your source list from tea leaves so long as you validate the information in the sources? Nothing replaces actually going out and verifying anything yourself (yet) but that doesn't make tools which do a first past somehow to blame for someone's laziness while tools that put no effort in at all are supposed to be just fine.