4 ms·
The author’s comments about knowing your business context and the potential impact of bugs really hit home with me. I have seen far too many teams using Facebo
by Scubabear68 2y ago
The author’s comments about knowing your business context and the potential impact of bugs really hit home with me.
I have seen far too many teams using Facebook sized solutions for a few thousand users.
I’ve seen developers slowed to an absolute crawl, terrified of shipping code, for a completely secondary operational platform with low volumes and non-critical data. All because the product people were misguided in their mission.
And sadly, I’ve seen teams with almost non-existent security practices and knowledge happily banging out crap in financial services environments.
And I’ve been blessed with teams understanding their position and fully embracing it. Financial services products with quarterly releases that were rock solid and well architected. Batch document processing systems with just a few dozen end users who worked closely with us developers to tune algorithms where sometimes we would ship multiple times in a day and re run batches in production.
To be successful, teams gotta know if you’re at NASA level, or life threatening, or business critical, or somewhat critical, or just nice tooling, plus understand the cash flow / budget situation. As a dev you may not be privy to all that, but strive to know as much of this as you can.
And of course, understand who you users are, and who your customers are, and prioritize accordingly.
- trashburger 2y agoI am personally at the “nice tooling” level, but am currently building towards supporting other teams at the “business critical” level, so I try to apply the same rigour to everything that I do. It might make sense to also consider your dependents in similar scenarios.