5 ms·
Given the number and complexity of regulations, and the amount of time and effort that goes into determining what they should be; it doesn't seem realistic to h
by RHSeeger 2y ago
Given the number and complexity of regulations, and the amount of time and effort that goes into determining what they should be; it doesn't seem realistic to have Congress pass laws for every regulation. Delegating power some things seems like the only realistic option.
- Molitor5901 2y agoThat's not quite how the system works. Regulations can be made but they must be made within the statutory authority granted by congress. This is one of the reasons why the DEA, etc. has not been able to declassify marijuana as a harmful drug. They don't have the authority. I am stumped why we would want any regulatory government body to act beyond it's congressional authority. I think you might be misinterpreting the meaning of the word authority.
- RHSeeger 2y agoI don't understand where your comment is coming from. My comment was in response to "Congress abdicating their power" here... > The power grab that was done was with Congress abdicating their power into unelected bureaucracies to create and enforce rules with the force of law. What the supreme Court is saying is that Congress cannot abdicate their power into an unelected bureaucracy. If you're talking about Congress giving power it doesn't actually have to an organization, then that's a totally different thing. It is not what I was talking about.