3 ms·
There could just be a difference in hardware. I'm a Firefox user but there is a noticeable difference, just not one that matters much on a top tier soc
by pohuing 2y ago
There could just be a difference in hardware. I'm a Firefox user but there is a noticeable difference, just not one that matters much on a top tier soc
- jakub_g 2y agoLoading JS heavy pages like Twitter on Firefox Android is way slower than Chromium based. Very noticeable on 2019 hardware, less so but still on 2022 hardware.
- erinaceousjones 2y agoAh, fair point. I'm on a pixel 6, so I have a privileged perspective that like 90% of smartphone browser users don't have because fairly new and fast SoC with a good amount of memory. I hadn't considered how much a difference that makes, because conceptually in my head "it's just webpages!" like we're still in the early 2000's
- onli 2y agoThat hasn't been my experience at all. It was Firefox that made web browsing bearable again on my old android device.
- carlob 2y agoHonestly Twitter has become a downright hostile browsing experience on any browser and any hardware. It's probably on purpose to make you use the app.
- cduzz 2y agoWhat's the user visible tradeoff between "an average page is so laden with advertising and tracking nonsense that it loads slowly and is covered with crap, but that crap all renders real fast" vs "JS renders at 1/10th the speed but only the stuff you want to look at?"
- sierisimo 2y agoBut is completely Firefox fault? Some companies just test compatibility and optimize with Chrome in mind, forgetting that sometimes some browsers (Firefox as well) dont respect some standards. Or even adding some features only available in some browsers. Yes, is not as bad as it was in the 90s or 2000s, but is still a common issue
- thequux 2y agoI use Firefox on a ~2020 era Android, and not even a particularly great one at that. Works fine for me aside from a very few badly written sites, and certainly not any shower than chrome.