3 ms·

I don't think you'd be breaking the law doing that. As long as you don't reproduce any of the MS-owned material in your output. Data isn't protected by copyrigh

I don't think you'd be breaking the law doing that. As long as you don't reproduce any of the MS-owned material in your output. Data isn't protected by copyright (in the US at least), so your AI could extract the knowledge from some text and present it in its own different way.

exe34 2y ago
that won't stop them suing you into oblivion. they can afford the lawyers. you waste a decade of your life.
latexr 2y ago
> As long as you don't reproduce any of the MS-owned material in your output. That is exactly what you should be doing to call them out on their bullshit. From the article: > "I think that with respect to content that is already on the open web, the social contract of that content since the 1990s has been it is fair use," he opined. "Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like. That's been the understanding." Which means that from their logic you can just copy their content and reproduce it.