4 ms·
Couple of points, but not a physicist or scientist. 1. I believe most existing concentrating solar plants operate below 1,000C. 1,500C might be well understood
by leetnewb 2y ago
Couple of points, but not a physicist or scientist.
1. I believe most existing concentrating solar plants operate below 1,000C. 1,500C might be well understood in producing syngas using other energy sources, but operating a CSP at that temperature is not. To the extent that a company is bringing a CSP plant to market with 1000+ temperature operation, that is novel.
2. Heliostat design seems like a core focus of improving CSP performance. A lot of research direction is on lowering the cost and complexity of deploying and maintaining the mirrors. See: https://www.nrel.gov/csp/solar-fields.html https://www.nrel.gov/csp/solar-fields.html and https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/heliocon https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/heliocon
- fl7305 2y ago1,500 C sounds like it's way past what any normal metals can handle? But in this case, maybe it is enough to have just a small part of the central reaction vessel handle 1,500 C? Maybe using ceramics? Or can you 3D print an Inconel chamber with builtin cooling channels that makes it possible for the Inconel surface to handle the incoming heat?
- pfdietz 2y agoSilicon carbide would work up to 1800 C. Various refractory oxide ceramics could also work. This whole approach needs direct sunlight, so it's not great for a place, like Europe, where it's often cloudy. It would be better for deserts, like in Chile, Namibia, or maybe the Arabian Peninsula.
- fl7305 2y agoIt's not great for a production site. But for engineering tests, you can do a lot of stuff with no sun, and the occasional clear skies are used for sun testing.
- leetnewb 2y agoI think you nailed it on the ceramics. Pretty sure they are looking at falling ceramic particles in the tower to capture and transfer the concentrating solar.