4 ms·

The study followed 49 undergraduates who had taken Java classes. I would argue that, because of this, the students were probably more experienced with static t

• deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
• readme 14y ago
  Great point. Correlation != causation. At the end of the day it's about what YOU can hack it with. Use that language.
• mck- 14y ago
  A good point. Also, 49 programmers is very little. But even with thousands of developers using all sorts of languages, it's still moot to draw any conclusion from. It's very subjective and dependant on people's experience/taste/State-of-mind.. For me, switching from static (java) to dynamic typing (common lisp) has saved me a lot of development time. Or did it? Maybe it was Emacs? Maybe it was functional programming? Maybe it was the REPL? Maybe experience?
  • heretohelp 14y ago
    I think in a lot of cases programmers are happiest with their new hotness simply because they became better and more experienced programmers in the process of learning the new hotness, not because the new hotness is 'good' necessarily. Cf. node.js
• konstruktor 14y ago
  Using students (especially undergrads) is a typical problem of programmer productivity studies. N=49 and 27h of experimentation time per subject isn't a lot either. Doing a study that can draw actually useful conclusions may just be prohibitievely expensive.