5 ms·
At least count them properly: NT 3.1 - Good(?). NT 3.5 - Bad(?). NT 4.0 - Good(?). 2000 - Bad(?!) XP - Good(?). Vista - Bad. 7 - Good. 8 - Bad. 8.1 - G
by Dalewyn 2y ago
At least count them properly:
NT 3.1 - Good(?).
NT 3.5 - Bad(?).
NT 4.0 - Good(?).
2000 - Bad(?!)
XP - Good(?).
Vista - Bad.
7 - Good.
8 - Bad.
8.1 - Good(???).
10 - Bad.
11 - Good(?).
And before anyone asks, yes this is a bad meme and doesn't even make any sense.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- toast0 2y agoEven numbered Trek Films/FreeBSD releases/Windows releases don't suck? I don't think it quite works though, because NT4 and NT5 (2k) were both good, although NT4 was hard to use with many games and win2k was better but still had some issues. I didn't hate XP on release and people grew to like it. So that's kind of 3 hits in a row, but then vista bad, 7 good, 8.x bad, 10 good, 11 bad kind of fits the pattern.