2 ms·
There's no issue with Congress interpreting laws here. The executive branch is (was). Which they have to do because how do you enforce a law that you do not hav
by bastawhiz 2y ago
There's no issue with Congress interpreting laws here. The executive branch is (was). Which they have to do because how do you enforce a law that you do not have an interpretation of? If Congress disagrees with the judiciary's interpretation they can just pass a law that makes their interpretation the literal law.
- rhaksw 2y agoThe executive does not interpret law in the sense understood by the separation of powers. Interpretation is a judiciary power.