Thanks, that makes sense I guess. Wish the article had spelled that out. Saying "the law was changed in 2012 but this aspect of it hadn't been tested before, th

Thanks, that makes sense I guess. Wish the article had spelled that out. Saying "the law was changed in 2012 but this aspect of it hadn't been tested before, though similar language in other laws and other contexts had been" seems like a key bit of explanation that is missing.