3 ms·
In this case, an alternative was the city providing a homeless shelter. The only shelter in town required those staying there to participate in religious activi
by vharuck 2y ago
In this case, an alternative was the city providing a homeless shelter. The only shelter in town required those staying there to participate in religious activities. So the homeless people had to choose between (1) arrest (2) forced religious participation, or (3) leaving town.
- Terr_ 2y ago> In this case, an alternative was the city providing a homeless shelter. No, in this [court] case an entirely different question was brought before the judges. "City policy shoulda been this other thing instead" was never on the menu of potential answers. The Supreme Court is--fortunately, for now--not some sort of King Solomon dictator that can jump the rails from "whose baby is this" to "all babies must be fingerprinted by midwives."