> This seems really inefficient though. Do we really want top-down authority of decision making like this? No, which is why we want the people previously free

> This seems really inefficient though. Do we really want top-down authority of decision making like this? No, which is why we want the people previously free to make top-down decisions, i.e. executive-branch agencies, to be subject to judicial oversight when attempting to read new powers for themselves into the law. Doing away with Chevron restores that oversight.