>Because ambiguous rules would have to be decided on anyway I think the implication by the OP was that they would now have to be decide by the court instead of

>Because ambiguous rules would have to be decided on anyway I think the implication by the OP was that they would now have to be decide by the court instead of by the executive branch agencies. Previously, those agency decisions could be brought to the court, but they didn't have to for an interpretation. That seems like a subtle but important nuance.