3 ms·
Why do the scientists velieve that using a "quick test" that checks only part of DNA is good? Wouldnt it be better to do full sequencing, instead of this ITS te
by rvba 2y ago
Why do the scientists velieve that using a "quick test" that checks only part of DNA is good?
Wouldnt it be better to do full sequencing, instead of this ITS test? Especially if that part is mutating quickly.
If they want to move forward shouldnt thry do boring full sequencing? Then they can make real comparisons, not estimates?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- im3w1l 2y agoI think it's simply a matter of cost.