6 ms·
I would be surprised if courts had not already heard and decided cases on the meaning of all those terms. But if they haven’t, then sure I guess they should. Bu
by kogus 2y ago
I would be surprised if courts had not already heard and decided cases on the meaning of all those terms. But if they haven’t, then sure I guess they should. But precedent means they would only have to be decided once, not repeatedly litigated over and over as you seem to suggest.
- jf22 2y ago>But precedent means they would only have to be decided once I find it interesting we are discussing a case where precedent was overturned, and you are suggesting precedent will fix something.