2 ms·
It's certainly unscientific. Believing something to be true despite evidence to the contrary is fundamentally unscientific. Edit: Since people don't seem to un
by Locke1689 14y ago
It's certainly unscientific. Believing something to be true despite evidence to the contrary is fundamentally unscientific.
Edit: Since people don't seem to understand my point, there is more to the theories of celestial mechanics than just path prediction. Our understanding of the path mechanics is derived through our understanding of gravity. To believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth one would have to completely upend our theories of gravity, which have been shown by experiment to agree with predictions in almost all cases.