2 ms·
I agree with points more or less and have plenty experience moving around the region to understand what you are saying. The through traffic comment was a respo
by detourdog 2y ago
I agree with points more or less and have plenty experience moving around the region to understand what you are saying.
The through traffic comment was a response to my original comment that a person wanted to use the Hudson River tunnels to pass through NYC onto their destination. I picked the Varanzono bridge route as the southern route around the city and 87 for the northern route. I usually go further north than the GWB to crossover.
The massively out of your way I might prefer to NYC city traffic.
- evanelias 2y ago> The through traffic comment was a response to my original comment that a person wanted to use the Hudson River tunnels to pass through NYC onto their destination. Which parent comment are you referring to? I don't see any talking about non-NYC destinations besides yours. In any case, the only highways that are exempt are the West Side Highway and the FDR. These are the only highways in the zone. And generally you don't take either of those highways for anything other than "local traffic" as you said. So I'm just not understanding your point about routes outside of NYC, that doesn't make any sense in the context of congestion pricing and the exempted highways in the first place.
- detourdog 2y agoMaybe I only perceived it. Funnily enough it was your comment from someone discussing maintaining traveling while on 495 or 78. My comment was that travelers not going to Manhattan should choose a route that avoids the tunnels. I'm only now beginning to understand the point you are trying to make is that political outrage makes good policies tougher. I thought this sub-thread was regarding driving into Manhattan to get somewhere else is inconvenient and adding extra costs makes sense.