3 ms·
Its an entirely relevant response...they are saying what you call a poorly thought out adhoc format is still better than json in any form or dependency. Ironic
by petee 2y ago
Its an entirely relevant response...they are saying what you call a poorly thought out adhoc format is still better than json in any form or dependency.
Ironically your snark isnt relevant.
- orf 2y agoCould be instead YAML or TOML. The point wasn’t specifically and only a JSON dependency, it was a dependency in general to do something useful and standardised
- petee 2y ago> Would you rather it had a JSON dependency to parse a config file, or yet another poorly thought out, ad-hoc homegrown config file format Ok, but you didn't write that, and thus they responded as such. Snark was still unnecessary; they made a simple statement in reply.