3 ms·
> If that party can win elections by doing that, that’s what should happen. “Expertise” carries zero weight in a democracy other than its ability to persuade vo
by dctoedt 2y ago
> If that party can win elections by doing that, that’s what should happen. “Expertise” carries zero weight in a democracy other than its ability to persuade voters.
That's a pretty idealized view: The vast majority of voters just want competent governance, with guard rails to make sure the governors don't go too far, because they (the voters) have lives to live and other things on their minds.
As to persuading voters, we should remember the joke about Islamist parties' agitation for "democracy": One man, one vote — once.
- rayiner 2y agoNo, it’s fundamental to what democracy means and is. If we wanted “competent governance” we would just have China or Singapore run our country.
- dctoedt 2y agoIt's a spectrum, not a binary choice.
- radley 2y agoOr... just hear me out... we could hire experts in various fields, give them general principles to follow, let them work out the details, give them the authority to enforce it, and maintain the right to step in if they overreach. But yeah, "opinions are greater than facts" is technically a very democratic way to do things.