4 ms·
So if courts aren't to defer to agencies on such matters, to where do they look? Congress? The executive? We can hate on regulatory agencies all day long, but
by sandworm101 2y ago
So if courts aren't to defer to agencies on such matters, to where do they look? Congress? The executive? We can hate on regulatory agencies all day long, but they are least get stuff done. They show up to work and figure out how to move forwards. This decision seams a win for those political groups who, rather than actual fix anything, are bent on throwing sand into the gearbox.
- jimmyjazz14 2y ago"They get things done" has been one of the selling points for more than a few tyrannical regimes throughout history.
- sandworm101 2y agoAnd comparing the likes of the IRS or FDA to the tyrannical regimes of the past is the hallmark of sovereign citizens, tax protestors, healthcare deniers, and other bunker-dwellers who see view traffic tickets as an attack on their god-given right to drive a Tesla while trading bitcoin on a cellphone.
- ldf80g804 2y ago[dead]
- radley 2y agoIf I'm not mistaken, it's a selling point for functional governments too.
- jjk166 2y agoBecause it's not the problem people have with any of those tyrannical regimes.
- bbayles 2y agoWhat did they do prior to 1984?
- cogman10 2y agoEveryone deferred to the agencies. The 1984 ruling was one of the first where Chevron challenged an agency's authority.
- throw0101c 2y ago> Everyone deferred to the agencies. Delegating goes back to about 1825, and deferring ambiguities to the Executive has precedents to the 1920/30s: * https://constitution.findlaw.com/article1/annotation03.html https://constitution.findlaw.com/article1/annotation03.html
- sandworm101 2y agoThey did Chevron. Chevron was brought as a challenge to what was happening. The Chevron court basically said, "keep doing what you are doing. We are OK with it." Post-Chevron there was just a name and a more codified description of the past approach.
- cryptonector 2y agoSo many comment without reading the decision. Raimondo means only that the courts won't defer on matters of interpretation of law. If the agencies stick to the text and spirit of the statutes then their regulations will hold up. If they stretch the law, then they won't.
- sandworm101 2y agoDon't just read this decision. Read all of them.