3 ms·
I’d be cautious about assuming most who can benefit from continuous monitoring are already being overseen by a doctor for some range of known conditions. Having
by wwweston 2y ago
I’d be cautious about assuming most who can benefit from continuous monitoring are already being overseen by a doctor for some range of known conditions. Having just personally gone from apparently above average health to suffering a rapid onset vascular condition that probably would have come with some measurable anomalies in the days before I needed an ambulance, ER diagnosis, and surgery, I certainly can see a compelling case for widely available constant monitoring.
- nerdjon 2y agoI am not saying who would benefit, the lawsuit seems to be focused on loss of sales. I am legitimately curious about the actual number of sales that went to those without something diagnosed by your doctor. I don't know anyone that actually had any sort of real time monitoring before it was added to the apple watch. For those that had something recognized by your doctor to need something, I would hope your doctor would recognize the limitations (and lack of full approval) of the apple watch and would recommend an altarnative. So it isnt that I am saying who would benefit, but questioning the loss of sales.