3 ms·
Notably all of those polls are before it's implemented (by definition, since has not and likely will not be implemented). But it's not a new concept, and it tu
by kgermino 2y ago
Notably all of those polls are before it's implemented (by definition, since has not and likely will not be implemented).
But it's not a new concept, and it turns out that people like being able to drive easily, having quieter streets, and tax money for other services. Once you go from fear of the unknown to seeing the results a lot of policies get more popular and in every other example we have that absolutely applies to congestion pricing.
- PaulHoule 2y agoMy RSS reader just showed me this: https://phys.org/news/2024-06-unpopular-political-affect-electoral-outcomes.html https://phys.org/news/2024-06-unpopular-political-affect-ele...
- kgermino 2y agoWhich seems to indicate that Democrats will face the heat for congestion pricing as long as it remains unpopular, right? And again, my point is that it will remain unpopular until it’s implemented, but it will almost certainly become popular once it’s put in place. All you’re saying is that they turned what would probably be a non-issue by the election into something that people will remember and be upset about. That seems like a horrible political strategy. I know I for one am much more likely to vote for a democracy supporting Republican (if they exist at this point) because of shit like this, and you’re articles says they won’t even get benefit from cancelling it
- developerDan 2y agoThis is what frustrates me so much about American politics. Fear is the primary driver and prevents so much from happening. If it causes problems we can, gasp, undo the changes. If the tolls actually cause more harm there is a dead simple solution of: stop charging them. Instead NYC wasted hundreds of millions of dollars for literally nothing because of fear.
- PaulHoule 2y agoNot just the US. Look at how Germany took a generation to fulfill its promise to end nuclear power, waffled so many times, and came across as not taking its climate change and security commitments seriously in the end. It is not so much that I think they should have banned or not banned nuclear energy but that the process they went through to do it was damaging to legitimacy.