That's essentially the point. It's meant to be challenged in court in hopes that that the current Supreme Court will make some subjectively favorable "clarific

That's essentially the point. It's meant to be challenged in court in hopes that that the current Supreme Court will make some subjectively favorable "clarification" about what the Establishment Clause, etc says and provide a green light to more/other policies even if it strikes down this one. It does seem like a pretty crude attempt at that, likely frustrating to those who would have preferred to see a more sophisticated challenge raised, but that's what it is.