3 ms·
Good take as usual from Doctorow. His main arguments: - Automated content takedown systems (e.g YouTube Content ID) fail to recognize fair use cases, such as a
by cainxinth 2y ago
Good take as usual from Doctorow. His main arguments:
- Automated content takedown systems (e.g YouTube Content ID) fail to recognize fair use cases, such as academic discussions about copyright, and can be abused by bad actors to censor legitimate content.
- Intermediary liability frameworks (e.g. notice-and-takedown systems and proposed "filternets") disproportionately favor large corporations and can stifle free speech and creativity.
- Removing safe harbor protections (e.g. Section 230) could further entrench big tech monopolies and make it harder for everyday internet users to share content online.