Thanks for elaborating on your point, because I actually agree with it more after this. > The other thing is that the risk likely depends on the ingredient and

Thanks for elaborating on your point, because I actually agree with it more after this. > The other thing is that the risk likely depends on the ingredient and the amount Heavily agreed. Which is why I believe that the whole UPF classification is a silly and impractical idea. But I am fully on-board with targeting specific ingredients and their relative amounts, and issuing warnings on product labels based on that (while explicitly pointing out those ingredients, the risks, and by how much of a factor there is too much of it [in case there is a normal/safe amount for that particular ingredient]).