3 ms·
yup, but the style of the modules starts to diverge as different people maintain them. IMO one does want people whose fulltime job is to looking at a codebase
by t43562 2y ago
yup, but the style of the modules starts to diverge as different people maintain them.
IMO one does want people whose fulltime job is to looking at a codebase orthogonally to those who are just implementing a feature. People who make sure it builds fast, is secure tries to be consistent to some degree etc.
Many companies call teams/indivuduals like this a "cost centre" and disparage it because they are dolts.
- lukan 2y agoIf those code checkers are experienced programmers, who do not annoy people with arbitary guidelines and standards, then yes, this might also work. But I do not think they are always necessary as a seperate full time role, if everything works normal otherwise. And with working normal, I mean there is enough time to refactor and document and clean up and is actually done.