3 ms·
This trend of phone shaped e-readers is just so redundant. Phones already have amazing screens that are perfect for reading despite not being e-ink. The only a
by wraptile 2y ago
This trend of phone shaped e-readers is just so redundant. Phones already have amazing screens that are perfect for reading despite not being e-ink.
The only argument people make is that you separate your reading from your phoning and it's a weak take that feels like a capitalistic trend to just justify buying more gadgets.
- infotainment 2y agoI agree with you that phone shaped eReaders (like this or the Palma) make no sense, but for a different reason: I think eInk screens are vastly superior to LCD and want my phone to have one. Not putting a cellular radio on a phone shaped eReader completely defeats the purpose IMO.
- wraptile 2y agoMost people have led screens tho and e-ink superiority over high res led is arguable at best.
- WolfeReader 2y agohttps://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230313005152/en/Harvard-Study-Shows-E-Ink%E2%80%99s-ePaper-Is-Up-to-Three-Times-Healthier-for-Your-Eyes-Than-LCD-Screens https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230313005152/en/Har...
- wraptile 2y agoSo they found that it's slightly better than simply limiting blue light which every phone already has an option for.
- sleepycatgirl 2y agoNah, phones don't have that good of screens for reading. They are decent, yes, but not great. That's why I went with phone with e-ink screens, works wonders.
- WolfeReader 2y agoPhones - at least the mainstream smartphones - are shining light directly at you every time you look at them. It's harder on your eyes and harder on your phone's battery. These are not what you want for a good reading experience. Not to mention that you get to see and hear notifications - even the "silent" ones - while you're reading. E-readers can go weeks between charges, are easier on your eyes, and - when you're using them instead of your phone - actually help your phone's battery last longer too. And unless your phone is a "phablet" or a Galaxy Z Fold, that "amazing" screen is probably quite smaller than most e-readers. Which isn't a problem for people with good vision, but for those who need larger fonts to read comfortably, screen size can be a major factor.
- hollerith 2y ago>Phones - at least the mainstream smartphones - are shining light directly at you every time you look at them. There is light coming directly from the book into your eyes when you read a paper book, too. Since human vision is complicated and I'm not an expert on all the complications, I'm not going to say there are no visual advantages to an e-ink display, but "in a smartphone, the light shines directly at you" is emphatically not a satisfactory technical explanation of why an e-ink display is easier on your eyes. Also I own an early model of the Kindle Paperwhite, which of course has an e-ink display, and I don't notice any visual advantages. Also: my Paperwhite's backlight cannot be turned off while the user is using it to read, and it has a "diffuser" to spread the light evenly around the screen just like a backlit LCD display does. I.e., it is shining light directly in my eyes whenever I am using it using exactly the same components that a smartphone with an LCD display does, namely LED lights positioned at the edges of a diffuser. Is the product described by the OP actually different in this regard? I'm not sure, but the OP does discuss the product's backlight. Sorry if this comment sounds a little angry, but this non-explanatory explanation you've made and that I've quoted has been repeated many times over the years on this site.
- WolfeReader 2y agoFor sure, it's definitely not a technical explanation. Here's the technical explanation you want: https://sid.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsid.1191 https://sid.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsid.1191