4 ms·
Let me guess, it was very well funded and there were no fake deadlines and cross-team dependencies, am I correct or am I very correct?
by n_ary 2y ago
Let me guess, it was very well funded and there were no fake deadlines and cross-team dependencies, am I correct or am I very correct?
- contingencies 2y agoCancel the rocket launch people, we have a semantic incongruity! Correct is a binary state.
- kridsdale3 2y agoUnless you're working with Quantum Correctness.
- nurettin 2y agoIf you allow for composable statements, the whole can be half correct.
- Hasu 2y ago"When people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
- f1shy 2y agoI bet you are very correct
- structural 2y agoNot only was the funding effectively unlimited, but it was developed over 20+ years (so the whole program was designed to the standard that "the next person touching this code will never have touched this system before, and the last person who touched it isn't available to ask, and it still must be correct in the face of such change." Nothing moved very quickly, sometimes a change request took a year from initial writeup to implementation and close-out. It wasn't creative, but it worked. Very well.