> But an executive at the company “provided investigative information and gave an analysis of factual information previously released”, the NTSB said. Both acti

> But an executive at the company “provided investigative information and gave an analysis of factual information previously released”, the NTSB said. Both actions are banned under Boeing’s agreement with the agency, signed at the start of the Alaska investigation. > The NTSB said Boeing had painted the agency’s investigation “as a search to locate the individual responsible for the door plug work” during the briefing. This is not the case, it clarified: “The NTSB is instead focused on the probable cause of the accident, not placing blame on any individual or assessing liability. Then I guess you're being willfully ignorant. I'm not sure what's unclear about this? Boeing isn't allowed, per a signed and legally binding agreement, not to share any information from the investigation. They also aren't allowed to speculate on causes. They did both of these things. The things you state as arguments are irrelevant.