4 ms·
I read this comment on one of the threads on reddit: > It broke because of /r/politics. When a discussion thread gets meaningfully past 30,000 comments, it sta
by ggregoire 2y ago
I read this comment on one of the threads on reddit:
> It broke because of /r/politics. When a discussion thread gets meaningfully past 30,000 comments, it starts to lag subsequent submissions to that thread, and then lag the entire site, until there's eventually a full chokeoff. The debate thread ballooned to an insane number of 56k before mods locked it, at which point the comments in there were 25 minutes behind realtime.
> Had the /r/politics mods locked the first thread and started a new one properly, it wouldn't have caused a sitewide issue. But this has been a problem since forever. It just rarely happens because there are rarely scenarios where enough people are commenting on a single specific thread so as to cause the cascade failure.
- AnimalMuppet 2y agoHmm. Speculating, but that sounds like there's something O(n^2) in there...
- gandutraveler 2y agoWhy can't reddit automatically create a new thread after x comments.
- krapp 2y agoIDK but the likelihood of threads getting that big is probably so low that it isn't worth the effort, when it'll all blow over in a few days.
- mandmandam 2y agoThe likelihood of a thread that big being about something quite important is also very high though.