6 ms·
s/serious/hyped
by stoperaticless 2y ago
s/serious/hyped
- aydyn 2y agoNo. R fundamentally has not really improved in the past ~10 years. Do you know much about how R works? Also try: gsub('serious', 'hyped', x)
- lottin 2y agoMaybe because it already does what it intends to do reasonably well? I mean, what do you think needs to be improved?
- smcin 2y agoHere are 14 years of HN discussions/criticisms of R: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=R%20language&sort=byPopularity&type=story https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... "Does what it intends to do reasonably well" is going to be widely subjective, depending on whether the user's use-case is statistical/life-sciences vs more general purpose coding and relying on many packages; prototyping/experimentation vs production code; whether the user uses base-R, or tidyverse/data.table, etc. Here are two of those many posts: * An opinionated view of the Tidyverse “dialect” of the R language (July 5, 2019) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20362626 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20362626 * The R programming language: The good, the bad, and the ugly (epatters.org, 2018) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35571659 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35571659 -> https://www.epatters.org/post/r-lang/ https://www.epatters.org/post/r-lang/
- aydyn 2y agoIf youre unironically asserting that R already does everything well enough Im not going to take you seriously.
- lottin 2y agoI'm asking what needs to be improved, in your opinion. That's a normal follow-up question that you should be able to answer. Otherwise, why are you even commenting?
- aydyn 2y agoNo you arent, youre clearly asking in a rhetorical way. Re-read your post. Any criticism brought up you'd dismiss. Heres one: lack of native 64 bit integers.
- lottin 2y agoNo, I was just asking out of curiosity. You're overthinking too much.
- aydyn 2y agoNo, you were clearly asserting that R already does everything needed. Stop trying to gaslight.
- lottin 2y agoYou're crazy.
- dang 2y agoPlease don't cross into personal attack or name-calling, and please especially avoid this sort of tit-for-tat spat with another user. It's way against the site guidelines and makes for boring reading. I know it's not always easy to extricate oneself but it's helpful to remember that the only way to 'win' is to stop. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
- dang 2y agoPlease don't cross into personal attack or name-calling, and please especially avoid this sort of tit-for-tat spat with another user. It's way against the site guidelines and makes for boring reading. I know it's not always easy to extricate oneself but it's helpful to remember that the only way to 'win' is to stop. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
- skotobaza 2y agoYet you haven't provided any substantial points against it and assume that others will take you seriously...
- openrisk 2y agoThe issue is that even if you peel the hype (which is a fact), python is still far larger. If you check e.g. the journal of open source software (which does not have much ML/AI bias), most of the papers are python, with an occasional R and julia submission.