If you've been around the valley long enough to hear pitches, you've surely met some remarkable bullshitters who can convincingly describe with clarity and cris

If you've been around the valley long enough to hear pitches, you've surely met some remarkable bullshitters who can convincingly describe with clarity and crispness something that is actually nonsense and simply is not real. There's a group of attorneys that host a podcast on SCOTUS that present a pretty convincing case for this interpretation, at least to me. Here's the most recent episode https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/5-4/id1497785843?i=1000660149431 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/5-4/id1497785843?i=100... or https://player.fm/series/series-2622019/garland-v-cargill https://player.fm/series/series-2622019/garland-v-cargill