2 ms·
This level of fraud is almost non-existent when there is NO insurance and NO universal healthcare. Anytime the person paying is not the one receiving service,
by glzone1 2y ago
This level of fraud is almost non-existent when there is NO insurance and NO universal healthcare.
Anytime the person paying is not the one receiving service, the appeal of fraud goes up. When the person paying is not paying with their own money the appeal goes up and a TON of incentives argue against finding fraud. At least in govt, there is sometimes a willful blind eye because finding fraud causes a huge headache and you don't benefit or get paid more. In fact, if you are taking an administrative fee to manage the program, reducing expenditures can hurt your own budget.
I have traveled internationally where folks paid cash for services. It was a bit crazy - they would basically hold you hostage until you paid a bill / impound your car etc. BUT you could buy many drugs OTC (no DR visit even required) and the layers of things like approvals, pre-approvals, billing and billing codes etc simply didn't exist.
- svachalek 2y agoYeah I've wondered about a system where health insurance is for major events like injury accidents and cancer, and typical office visits are handled as a consumer product. Insurance companies may want to pay for basic checkups and the like to reduce their risk of high ticket items -- or not, however the math works out. Seems like this has at least some of the benefits of a market system, for those who insist that nationalized health care is not something we can stomach in the US.