NASA and Boeing have been battling criticism, fair or unfair you can decide, over how Boeing spent a lot more money and time and sent Starliner to the ISS with

NASA and Boeing have been battling criticism, fair or unfair you can decide, over how Boeing spent a lot more money and time and sent Starliner to the ISS with a bunch of engine failures and leaks. So the author went for an awkward attempt at saying "Look how great Starliner is, astronauts are even sheltering in it from all that Russian debris and will fly it back if needed". > this illustrates what Alice has been emphasizing -- that Bob has excellent OpSec The answer is below a bit: > "Starliner [...] is authorized to leave the ISS in case of emergency" I guess it would be something like: "As we all know, Bob has had a few slip-ups recently: he leaked his admin credentials in a public github repo, and then he also asked for a salary increase, but we'd like to emphasize that in an emergency Bob is fully authorized to respond to incidents and operate the system"