> wouldn't remove him because of how it would have reflected on the them! I hate having to witness this at work where there's a team who's been working on a sh

> wouldn't remove him because of how it would have reflected on the them! I hate having to witness this at work where there's a team who's been working on a shitty project FOR YEARS and then it gets standardized across the company seemingly out of sunk cost fallacy and ass-covering of the people running it. Meanwhile there was an competing implementation done ahead of schedule and technically excellent, got canned.