5 ms·
If you haven't had a kindle with buttons you have no basis of comparison. They're lovely.
by causi 2y ago
If you haven't had a kindle with buttons you have no basis of comparison. They're lovely.
- Tagbert 2y agoI used to have one of the older ones with buttons. now I have a recent Paperwhite and don't really miss them. I just tap on the screen edge and it works fine. I can understand the appeal of buttons and am glad that you have a reader with them but it's not something that motivates me.
- qotgalaxy 2y ago[dead]
- adolph 2y agoI’m sure the buttons are of the finest sort. That doesn’t invalidate a subjective eval that touch is fine for this context and an objective conjecture that physical buttons would lose orientation if orientation were changed 90°.
- causi 2y agoI don't see why you think physical buttons would lose orientation. My kindle had forward and back buttons on both sides that worked fine in either orientation, and on devices that only have one button per side the one on the bottom is next and the one on top is previous.
- adolph 2y agoI now understand your point about the physical button orientation remaining the same but the human-computer model shifting from a book-like right-left pagination to a computer-like scroll pagination. That is interesting to consider. Thank you.
- causi 2y agoI believe the default touch zones on new ereaders are in fact still shaped like interlocking L's, with the right side and most of the bottom counting as Next and the left side and most of the top counting as Previous.