4 ms·
What really stuck out to me was how soft the opinions were. Especially the dissent. Rather than dry legal reasoning, it was argued much like a politician woul
by rootusrootus 2y ago
What really stuck out to me was how soft the opinions were. Especially the dissent. Rather than dry legal reasoning, it was argued much like a politician would. Maybe this happens fairly often, but usually when I read the actual decision from SCOTUS is is very specific and sober, even if I disagree with the conclusion.