4 ms·

> I know of no other way to read this other than lock away people because they are rich whether they are guilty or not. Is there a reason you omitted the first

> I know of no other way to read this other than lock away people because they are rich whether they are guilty or not. Is there a reason you omitted the first sentence from that quote?

legitster 2y ago
The first sentence didn't contain his rationale?
- diob 2y ago
  You're attacking a strawman, try steelmanning the argument to "rich people who commit crimes should go to jail every now and then". I think we can all agree.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]