4 ms·
I did read it and your comment is technically all true, but it's also a very charitable reading of the information. He most probably knew who they were and the
by tootie 2y ago
I did read it and your comment is technically all true, but it's also a very charitable reading of the information. He most probably knew who they were and the Trump campaign was in the loop on his activities. He's never corrected the record to my knowledge. He has a pretty bad track record of protecting his sources, so offering a reward for information on who killed Seth Rich seems like a deliberate misdirection. The entire situation feels very intentional and you'd have make a bigger leap of logic to say he was so totally fooled rather than he knew and just didn't care.
I do agree that it's not constructive to say "he's a villain" but it seems the prevailing trend is "he's a hero" and he is most definitely not a hero.