3 ms·
As someone building an AI company right now, my quick Pro/Con for 4o vs Claude 3.5: Claude: subjectively sounds more human to me, and really nails data questio
by liquidise 2y ago
As someone building an AI company right now, my quick Pro/Con for 4o vs Claude 3.5:
Claude: subjectively sounds more human to me, and really nails data questions that 4o is lackluster at
4o: far better assistant logic reasoning. I can trivially break Claude's assistant (system prompt) instructions within the user prompt, where 4o succeeds in all of these tests.
Pricing and output speed, for our purposes, are functionally identical. Exciting to have a competitor in the space already who stands to keep openai honest.
- xwolfi 2y agoAnd hum, what incredible problem are you solving at your AI company? Must be the forefront of human innovation ! I hope it's porn.
- dmazin 2y agoAha, so I’m not the only one. For both Claude 3 Opus and 3.5 Sonnet, anecdotally its language is far more natural. So much so that I prefer it over 4o.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]