Everything you say is true, except that is not what the complaint was about. In fact, in rejecting standing, the Supreme Court notes: > Complicating the plaint

Everything you say is true, except that is not what the complaint was about. In fact, in rejecting standing, the Supreme Court notes: > Complicating the plaintiffs’ effort to demonstrate that each platform acted due to Government coercion, rather than its own judgment, is the fact that the platforms began to suppress the plain- tiffs’ COVID–19 content before the defendants’ challenged communi- cations started. How can it be jawboning when the contact comes after a decision was already made? If even the plaintiffs aren’t alleging impropriety that follows normal causality, all that’s left is that NO contact can be legal.