4 ms·
I think you require proof of culpability, not the other way around. This is like being asked to prove you’re not guilty.
by orochimaaru 2y ago
I think you require proof of culpability, not the other way around. This is like being asked to prove you’re not guilty.
- deciplex 2y agoNo, it's not, because this isn't a court of law. You're allowed to read between the lines here and use common sense. You don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Given the history of the US on matters such as this, it would be unusual if we weren't involved. That's really all that needs to be said.