3 ms·
Her position on abortion in the context of this discussion is directly related to her position on Roe V. Wade. But if you want to be purposely obtuse and prete
by krapp 2y ago
Her position on abortion in the context of this discussion is directly related to her position on Roe V. Wade.
But if you want to be purposely obtuse and pretend that you don't understand that, fair enough.
- anon291 2y agoNo... it's really not. She said the way it was argued (privacy) was not a solid legal ground, which is correct. Roe v Wade the case was not about abortion as a whole (which is still legal in the United States as a whole, since there's no law banning it). Roe v Wade was a case that said the Constitution has a right to privacy that includes abortion, which it does not. Maybe in the future, someone will attempt to argue an equal rights case. Maybe not. Either way, that case will not be Roe v Wade. Supporting abortion is not the same as supporting Roe v Wade. Two separate things when it comes to law.