3 ms·
This is just a way more reactionary way to communicate model benchmarks. “A computer algorithm performed better than humans on a task it was designed for” soun
by threecheese 2y ago
This is just a way more reactionary way to communicate model benchmarks.
“A computer algorithm performed better than humans on a task it was designed for” sounds like the last forty years in a nutshell.
- falcor84 2y agoThe big question remains - "Is there any benchmark at all on which algorithms can't pass human performance given sufficient resources?". If I were a being man, I would put my money on 'no'
- RoyalHenOil 2y ago"Given sufficient resources" is the key phrase here. Humans are ridiculously energy efficient. We are capable of extremely complex thought — as well as a range of physical movement! — while using less energy than most household appliances. I am skeptical that we will ever create non-biological AI that can compete with that.